Michael Moore Is (Still) Fat

Yesterday "thePrez" reversed his stance on releasing more fotos and vids of USer troopers valiantly torturing and abusing the stinking rag-haids who hate us for our freedoms. Ken Silverstein, Harper's Magazine DC bureau chief and blogger at Washington Babylon, records some interesting parallels...

The More Things Change…

Via michaelmoore.com:

Obama ‘09: In a reversal, President Barack Obama objected on Wednesday to the release of dozens of photographs showing the abuse of terrorism suspects, fearing the pictures could trigger a backlash against U.S. troops…”The president strongly believes that the release of these photos, particularly at this time, would only serve the purpose of inflaming the theaters of war, jeopardizing U.S. forces, and making our job more difficult in places like Iraq and Afghanistan,” [an] official, who declined to be identified, said.

Bush ‘06: Publicizing more images depicting alleged abuse of detainees at Iraqi’s Abu Ghraib prison could bring harm to U.S. service-members, a senior Defense Department official said here today. The release of more Abu Ghraib images “could only further inflame and possibly incite unnecessary violence in the world and would endanger our military men and women that are serving in places around the world,” DoD spokesman Bryan Whitman told Pentagon reporters.

Presidents seem incapable of escaping the rhetorics of their predecessors. But of course, the photos themselves are not the problem. What is important are the acts that the fotos display. Calling the fotos the problem, as many on the Rightard fringes--but also many (a distressing number, officially and in the blogs) Obamanistas--claim is akin to claiming that smokers are further harmed by images of cancerous lungs displayed in anti-smoking ads...