Obama administration defends telecom immunity in new briefThis list suggests the truth of the contentions of those who, on matters of international relations and internal 'security,' at least, regard there being no significant differences between the 'parties,' because the "parties" are no more than wholly-owned subsidiaries of CorpoRat/Military Murka. It is worth remembering, as I have proclaimed so often as to have become hoarse, that NO PRESIDENT SINCE George Washington has EVER ceded back to Congress the emergency powers they arrogated to address a crisis.
Obama administration tries to kill e-mail case
In "spy case," Obama's Justice Department Holds Fast to State Secrets Privilege
Obama administration defending Bush secrets
Obama preserves renditions as counter-terrorism tool
Obama's Top Lawyer Says Obama Doesn't Want To "Weaken" Presidency
Intelligence Policy: New Perspective or Familiar Approach?
Obama eyes $200 bln for war effort: report
Obama's Iraq plan 'more like a Bush plan'
Obama Admin. Reportedly Sending Detainees to Bagram Instead of Gitmo
I am one of those who doesn't perceive a nickel's worth of difference between the Pukes and the Dims. Oh, yes, there are individual differences between individual personalities occupying positions of power. But their agendas, their 'ends-in-view', are indistinguishable. Both "parties" work for more surevillance, more militarism, more corporate authoritarianism, less freedom, less liberty, less services (for more taxes).